Solutions to Practice Problems – Chapter 17

 

 

1 a) WACC = (D/V) Rd + (E/V) Re   =>   0.13 = 0.15*Rd + 0.85*0.145  

=>  Rd = (.13 - .85*.145)/.15 = 4.5%

b) In PCM, a levered firm’s WACC always equals the unlevered firm’s cost of capital.  So, if the firm was unlevered, its cost of capital would be 13%.

 

2 a) D/E = .9   =>  D = .9*E    =>   D/V = .9E/(E+.9E) = .9/1.9 = .4737

WACC = (D/V) Rd + (E/V) Re = .4737*.12 + (1 - .4737)*.156 = 13.8947%

b) A lovely little trick question.  You don’t compute out WACC at the new debt-equity ratio using the same cost of debt and equity.  At a different debt level, both Rd and Re would be lower than before, but the weighted average cost of capital still stays the same, so the answer is 13.8947%.

 

3 a)      0.12 = 0.45*Rd + 0.55*0.18  

=>  Rd = (.12 - .55*.18)/.45 = 4.6667%

b) The new cost of debt would be 1.2*.046667 = 5.6%

The WACC doesn’t change; it’s still 12%.

Re = Ra + (Ra – Rd)*(D/E) = .12 + (.12 - .056)*(.6/.4) = 21.6%   (remember, WACC = Ra)

 

4) In perfect capital markets, VL = VU = 220,000/0.11 = 2,000,000 

E = VL - D = 2,000,000 - 800,000 = 1,200,000

The required return on the firm’s assets, Ra, is the same as the required return on its equity if it stays unlevered.  So WACC = Ra = 11%

            Re = Ra + (Ra – Rd)*(D/E) = .11 + (.11 - .06)*(8/12) = 14.3333%

                                                                

5 a) The required return on assets is the same as the WACC, so:

            Ra = (D/V) Rd + (E/V) Re = (8/25)*.115 + (17/25)*.165 = 14.9%

b) Debt would then be $5 million, and equity would be $20 million.

Re = Ra + (Ra – Rd)*(D/E) = .149 + (.149 - .10)*(5/20) = 16.125%

 

6 a) V = 1,250,000/.09625 = 12,987,012.99

D = 300,000/.06 = 5,000,000

E = 12,987,012.99 - 5,000,000 = 7,987,012.99

b) Re = Ra + (Ra – Rd)*(D/E) = .09625 + (.09625 - .06)*(5/7.987) = 11.8943%

 

7 a) Since dividend policy and capital structure are both irrelevant in PCM, the two pieces of news they announce on Tuesday have no effect on the stock price.  So the value of the firm on Tuesday = 1000*60 = $60,000

On Wednesday, the value of the firm increases by the $15,000 they raise by issuing the debt.   Firm value is now $75,000.

On Thursday, the value of the firm falls by the $17,000 they pay out as dividend.  Firm value is now $58,000.

b) The stock price doesn’t change on Tuesday; it’s still $60.

On Thursday it falls by the amount of the dividend per share, which is $17.  Stock price is now $43.

c) Stockholder’s wealth cannot change; in PCM it is unaffected by capital structure or dividend decisions. 

Initial wealth = value of shares = 1000*60 = 60,000

Final wealth = dividend + ex-dividend value of shares = 17,000 + 1000*43 = 60,000

 

Moral: In PCM, it doesn’t matter whether a dividend payment is financed by issuing new equity or issuing new debt.  Either way, there’s no effect on stockholder wealth.

 

8 a) When making capital structure decisions, managers can maximize either the stock price or the value of the firm; stockholder wealth is maximized either way.  F The value of the firm is D + E.  Maximizing the stock price will be the same as maximizing E, but no the same as maximizing D + E.  Stockholder wealth is maximized by maximizing the value of the firm.

b)   When a firm makes a pure capital structure change, the proceeds from issuing new debt must be paid out to stockholders.  T Since we hold the assets of the firm constant, the cash that is raised by issuing debt cannot be retained by the firm, it has to be paid out to stockholders.

c)   An investor who is more risk averse prefers to invest in the equity of the unlevered firm.  T The risk of equity increases with leverage (since financial risk gets added to the business risk coming from the assets); equity of the levered firm is riskier, and a more risk averse investor wants less risk.

d)   Given an unlevered firm U and an otherwise identical levered firm L, buying 2% of U’s equity or buying 1% of L’s equity and 1% of L’s debt yields identical investments.  F We need to buy 1% of U’s equity, not 2%.  

e)   Borrowing money to buy shares of the unlevered firm has the same effect as buying shares in the levered firm. T Personal borrowing increases the risk of the investment in exactly the same way as corporate borrowing; borrowing money to buy shares of U creates an identical investment to buying shares of L.

f)    In perfect capital markets, capital structure is irrelevant because investors are indifferent between dividends and capital gains. F Indifference between dividends and capital gains is what makes dividend policy irrelevant.  Capital structure is irrelevant because investors have equal access, and can mimic or undo the effects of leverage.

g)   In perfect capital markets, as a firm increases its debt ratio, the cost of debt and the weighted average cost of capital both stay constant.  F WACC stays constant (at Ra) but the cost of debt increases (since the debt gets more risky).

h)   If the cost of debt was always less than the cost of equity, a firm would be able to reduce its weighted average cost of capital just by using more debt and less equity.  F The cost of debt is always less than the cost of equity (Rd < Ra < Re) but the WACC still stays constant as you increase debt.  You are using more of the cheaper source of capital but this is offset by the fact that the cost of debt and the cost of equity both increase as you increase your debt.  The weighted average doesn’t change.

i)    In PCM maximizing firm value is the same as minimizing WACC, but this is not necessarily true in the real world because capital structure decisions can affect the cashflows generated by assets. T Since firm value is computed by discounting expected CFs at the WACC, maximizing firm value is the same as minimizing WACC only if the expected CFs stay constant.  In the real world, debt financing affects expected CFs since it can make firms deviate from the NPV rule when making investment decisions.

 

Return to Contents Page