Solutions to Problem Set # 4
1 a) VU = (ECF of firm)/Ra => ECF of firm = 6,200,000*.108 = 669,600
CF to s/h = ECF of firm - Interest = 669,600 - 275,000 = 394,600
D = interest/Rd = 275,000/.079 = 3,481,012.66
E = VL - D = VU - D = 6,200,000 - 3,481,012.66 = 2,718,987.34
Re
= Ra + (Ra Rd)*(D/E) = .108 + (.108 -
.079)*(3,481,012.66/2,718,987.34) =
14.5128%
b) Alternately, since E = (CF to s/h)/Re, Re = 394,600/2,718,987.34 = 14.5128%
c)
WACC is not affected by leverage, and always equals Ra.
So WACC is still 10.8%.
2
a)
Expected cashflow from the project = .5*750 + .3*1,500 + .2*3,000
= 1,425
NPV
of project = 1425/1.06 1,100 = 244.34
b)
If
the project is not taken, cashflows will be as follows:
State of Economy
Probability
Total CF CF to b/h
CF to s/h
Great
0.5
16,000
10,500 5,500
Okay 0.3
11,900 10,500 1,400
Poor
0.2
7,000
7,000
0
The
value of debt is (.8*10,500 + .2*7,000)/1.06
= 9,245.28
The
value of equity is (.5*5,500 + .3*1,400/1.06 = 2,990.57
If the project is taken, cashflows are as follows:
State of Economy
Probability
Total CF CF to b/h
CF to s/h
Great
0.5
16,750
10,500 6,250
Okay 0.3
13,400 10,500 2,900
Poor
0.2
10,000
10,000
0
The
value of debt is (.8*10,500 + .2*10,000)/1.06
= 9,811.32
The
value of equity is (.5*6,250 + .3*2,900/1.06 = 3,768.87
So
the wealth of bondholders increases by 9,811.32
- 9,245.28
Since stockholders contribute the investment of 1,100, the increase in their wealth = 3,768.87 - (2,990.57 + 1,100) = -321.70
Bondholders get the entire NPV of the project, 244.34. In addition, they get a wealth transfer of 321.70 from the stockholders. This explains their total increase in wealth of 566.04.
c)
Stockholders will not invest in this project, since it reduces their wealth by
321.70.
3 a) Since the debt-to-value ratio is given (and Rd is not) we need to compute WACC using:
WACC
= Ra
* [ 1 (D/V)*
Tc]
Then VL = (ECF of firm)/WACC = 365,000/.10382 = 3,515,700.25
The straightforward way to compute debt is using the debt-to-value ratio: D = 3 * 3,515,700.25 = 1,054,710.08
There is only one other way to compute D with the information given. (Since the interest amount is not given, you cannot go D = Interest/ Rd, after computing Rd).
We have to use VL = VU + D* Tc => 3,515,700.25 = 365,000/.116 + D*.35 = 3,146,551.72 + D*.35
=> D = (3,515,700.25 - 3,146,551.72)/0.35 = 1,054,710.08
E = VL - D = 3,515,700.25 - 1,054,710.08 = 2,460,990.18 (or you can go .7*3,515,700.25)
Finally, solve for Rd from the WACC equation:
.10382 = .3 * (1 - .35) * Rd + .7 * .133 = .195 Rd + .0931
=> Rd = (.10382 - .0931)/.195 = 5.4974%
The
after-tax cost of debt is then Rd (1
Tc)
b) When the debt-to-equity ratio changes to .625, debt-to-value = .625/1.625 = 0.3846
WACC = .116 * (1 - .3846*.35) = 10.0385%
Then VL = 365,000/.100385 = 3,636,015.33
D = 0.3846 * 3,636,015.33 = 1,398,467.43
Or, the other way, D = (3,636,015.33 - 3,146,551.72)/0.35 = 1,398,467.43
E = VL - D = 3,636,015.33 - 1,398,467.43 = 2,237,547.89
Rd, however, cannot be computed (since we don't the new value of Re)
4 a) T = 1 [(1 - Tpe)(1 - Tc)]/( 1 - Tp) = 1 (1 - .13)*(1 - .35)/(1 0.28) = .214583
VU
= 1,675,000/0.125 = 13,400,000
D
= 579,000/0.086 = 6,732,558.14
PVTS
= D*T
=
6,732,558.14
VL
= 13,400,000 + 1,444,694.77
Now
we can compute the value of equity: E = VL
D = 14,844,694.77 -
6,732,558.14
b) Annual cashflow to s/h = firm's cashflow - interest + annual interest tax shield
= 1,675,000 - 579,000 + 579,000*.214583
(Can also compute this the backdoor way: Annual cashflow to s/h = E * Re. This would require computing WACC as done below, and then solving for Re in the other WACC formula.)
c)
The original WACC
= Ra
* [ 1 (D/V)*
T]
= .125 * [1 (8.112/14.845)*.214583]
= 11.2835%
new WACC = .95 * .112835 = 10.7193%
=> .107193 = .125* [ 1 (D/V)* .214583]
=> D/V = (1 - .107193/.125)/.214583 = .6639
The new value of the firm is 1,675,000/0.107193 = 15,625,994.49
The new value of debt is 0.6639 * 15,625,994.49 = 10,373,566.56
5
a) Firm A:
WACC = Ra * [ 1 (D/V)* T] = .1234*(1 - .18*.22) = 11.8513%
.118513 = (D/V) Rd*(1 - T) + (E/V) Re = .18*.057*(1 - .22) + .82*Re = .008003 + .82 Re
=>
Firm
B:
WACC = Ra * [ 1 (D/V)* T] => .0987 = .1111 * [ 1 (D/V)* .22]
=> D/V = (1 - .0987/.1111)/.22 = .5073
.0987 = .5073*.Rd*(1 - .22) + .4927*.1293 = .3957 Rd + .063073
=>
Firm
C:
WACC
= (D/V)
Rd*(1
- T)
+
(E/V) Re = .36
*
.063 *
.78
+ .64*.1380 = 10.6010%
Ra
= WACC/[ 1 (D/V)*
T]
= .10601/[1 .36*.22] = 11.5129%
b) We use the same basic approach as in Ch. 9. Take the average Ra for the sample of firms, and use the project's D/V ratio to compute the project's WACC:
Average Ra =
(.1234 + .1111 + .115129)/3 = 11.6543%
At
a D/V ratio of .25, WACC = Ra
* [ 1 (D/V)*
T]
= .116543 * [1 .25*.22]
= 11.0133%
6
b) First compute the projects APV, and then do WACC.
Base
case NPV = 18,000/.106 175,000 = -5,188.68
Amount
of new debt to be issued = 175,000*.35/(1 - .03) = 63,144.33
Issue costs for debt = .03*63,144.33 = 1,894.33
(Proceeds of debt issue should be .45 * 175,000 = 61,250. Verify this: 63,144.33 - 1,894.33 = 61,250)
Amount
of new equity to be issued = 175,000*.2/(1 - .05) = 36,842.11
Issue
costs for equity = .05*36,842.11
(Proceeds of equity issue should be .2 * 175,000 = 35,000. Verify this: 36,842.11 - 1,842.11 = 35,000)
Total
issue costs = 1,894.33 + 1,842.11
PVTS
= D*T = 63,144.33*0.2
= 12,628.87
Adjusted
NPV of project = Base case NPV + PVTS - Issue costs = -5,188.68
a)
For computing WACC we use the value of the project before issue costs are
subtracted away.
In other words, V = NPV + investment + Issue costs = 3,703.75 + 175,000
+ 3,736.44 = 182,440.19
WACC
= Ra
* [ 1 (D/V)*
T]
= .1 * [1
(63,144.33/182,440.19)*.2] =
9.8662%
(Verify that this WACC yields correct NPV:
NPV = 18,000/.098662 - 175,000 - 3,736.44 = 3,703.75)